CT Beer Trail

Last beer I drank: Blue Moon Spring Blonde Wheat Ale

 


 

            I've found that people generally have a mixed reaction about Blue Moon's lineup of wheat ales. Some beer fans frown at the fact that Blue Moon isn't quite as flavorful as a classic witbier. Others enjoy the easy-sipping body of Blue Moon and it's approachable hop content. I personally think Blue Moon in general is "beer": not really great, but not bad. A good "gateway" beer if you will. This seasonal brew falls perfectly in line with my line of thinking. It's an easy going ale that sips with only a slight hop content and finishes with a light tang associated to wheat ales. Blue Moon suggests a lemon or orange garnish for their beers. I had mine without, but I could see how a burst of citrus would balance out the flavors of this beer immensely. Bottom line? This is a easy sipping beer that won't really excite you with newness, but will be a comfortable brew during these first few weeks of spring. I would also love to try it with some chicken grilled out on the BBQ.

            Let's shift gears to the topic of the day. What comes to you mind when you hear the adjective "economy"? Generally I think it can mean one of two things. The first is "cheap but effective". Case in point: the economy car.

 It's not the size of the . . . well ok I guess it is kind of the size that matters.

(Courtesy Flickr)

            I'm not one to knock a mode of transport (my automobile is certainly nothing grand to speak of). A car is made to get you from point A to point B. However, some cars move you while looking really ugly, and some allow you to arrive at your destination in style. Some cars that are (typically) ugly are defended as being "economy". That is they get 200 miles to the gallon and save you enough money to buy things that hopefully compensate for the car that you have selected. In this case "economy" has become somewhat a backhanded label. Sure you save money, but you're driving a shoebox which frat guys will tip over at the drop of a hat (or end of a championship game). Small price to pay in this day and age? Debatable, but you will be the one laughing when you can basically drive through a gas station to refuel.

            The other meaning of "economy" that I've found has been associated to friggin' huge boxes of food and house goods that cost less overall than buying the same amount from a typical supermarket.

 In keeping with illustrating my points with animal metaphors, the economy sized dog is on the left.

(Courtesy Flickr)

 

So this "economy" is a more forgivable usage. Wholesale markets save the buyer tons of money, give you tons of goods, and best of all the goods are humorously oversized. This of course allows one to store things inside cereal boxes big (and strong) enough to hold 3 or 4 bowling balls. In this case the "economy" runs parallel to the first use, but is less laughable.

            Now that we've established the nomenclature of "economy" would someone mind telling me what "economy beer" is? I joke you not. While out on the weekly chores in a big name supermarket, I took to browsing the beer aisle (a top placer for 'top five aisles in the grocery store'). I went through the import section, to micro-brew, and on to domestic, when I looked up and noticed a new area, at the tail end of domestic:

 This beer is neither fuel-efficient or humorously oversized.

 

It took me a minute to process this new and interesting label. Had I gone too far over in the aisles? Was this a mis-labeling? After some investigation I found that no, this was just the convenient way for the store to label their beer as, well, cheap. In every sense of the word. I've tried to formulate why "economy" beer would be appealing to anyone, and I've been having a hard time rationalizing it. In the sense of the first definition I guess you do get good "mileage" out of economy-beer as you get thirty for the price of two decent beers, but what destination could anyone possibly end up at swilling the stuff? A buzz reeking of old sweat socks? In the sense of the second definition I suppose you're getting more for your money, but once again: 1000 bad beers could never even equal 1 "ok" beer in terms of taste.

            I guess I should be pleased: at last grocery stores are being honest about the food they stock. It does make me wonder what would happen if they applied this honesty to the entirety of their store though.

            "Excuse me, I'm looking for those 2000 calorie "Hungry man dinners."

            "Certainly sir, those are in aisle 10: artery clogging and hardening foods."

            If anything this label of "economy beer" does make it easier for people looking for decent beer know where to look; namely as far to the left of this aisle placement as possible.

            I'll end at that note, taking another knock at cheap, crappy beer. Next time tune in as I drink what some might call crappy beer in order to come up with a solid definition of good "gateway beers" to introduce your friends and family to!

Views: 70

Tags: Beer, beer, culture, economy, good

Comment

You need to be a member of CT Beer Trail to add comments!

Join CT Beer Trail

Comment by Brew and Wine Hobby on April 22, 2011 at 8:20am
One of the other issues is that, the marketing of the largest firms like InBev is a budget beyond what any local market player could hope for.  By performing the marketing they create a demand for a product- not a taste.  Micro's live and die by the taste driving folks to repeat business.  That combined with prudent finances (great point Ron), make or break the smaller players.  If they then survive to go mid-scale they can compete on the local/regional market level for marketing.
Comment by Brien Stephen on April 20, 2011 at 9:56am
Unfortunately it does seem that foreign markets have consistently higher quality of beer for a better price. On my last trip to Canada I made sure to go to their Beer Stores to make a sampling. Due to the socio-economic politics up there it is REALLY hard to get a brewery up and running (due to federal funding, certain permits required, etc etc). But because of the difficulty, the beer that makes it through (even the 'cheap' stuff) all the regulations are really good, at a really good price. The major downside is that most every Beer Store (the inside of which reminds me more of a post office than a package store) has the exact same 13 or so beers to choose from. I'm not sure about the business models in other nations, but free market vs. federal funded programs definitely have distinct pros and cons.
Comment by Ron Page on April 20, 2011 at 9:41am
As someone who takes daily showers in beer .....(no, not some kinda kinky habit, just part of the job) I may possibly be a bit more jaded regarding the perception of beer quality and marketing than the average guy who has to shell out hard earned dollars for their daily pint(s).   One thing most professional brewers have is a tremendous respect for the way the big guys manage to produce a clean consistent product and actually make a decent profit.   The Ct. Beer trail is littered with forgotten breweries (Elm City, Trout Brook, Hammer & Nail, Hartford Brewing, etc.) who made really good microbeer but didn't manage to stay in business.  I used to claim that if it says "beer" on the label, than it can't be all bad.....(until one of my daughter's friends left a six of Coors Light at the house and I forced myself to drink almost half a can of that swill in the name of Malt Science! )  I've always liked Coors Extra Gold.....a strange example, in that it is higher quality than regular Coors, but is marketed at a ridiculously low price in 30 pack cans.   Go figure.   I guess that's why my everyday goal is to find that brand of great beer at an "economical" price.  Time to move to Germany???
Comment by Brien Stephen on April 19, 2011 at 1:17pm
That's a really interesting point you made Ron. I never considered that the base cost of beer is relatively close in price. I would assume the only thing that cost more to make is something made with more exotic hops, or maybe some crazy triple stout.

And unfortunately marketing crud as a "must have item" then marking it up to sell to the masses seems to be a relatively old trick in American (or maybe international) business. Ah well, that's why the beer trail is here: educate and illuminate the glories of good beer to everyone who will listen. Or maybe just drink the good stuff ourselves.
Comment by Bryon Turner on April 15, 2011 at 8:33pm
I often wonder how different domestic beer was before prohibition.
Comment by Ron Page on April 15, 2011 at 12:25pm
It's actually quite simple:  As a general rule: Cheap price equals lower alcohol content (less ingredients), or, Cheap price equals extremely short aging time (quicker turnover), or, Cheap price equals old stock( which would have been discarded anyway).   The sad fact is that even cheap domestic beers cost almost the same to make as a "super premium" from the same industrial brewery...most of the actual cost is in packaging and labor, not ingredients and aging..Like any good business, the big brewers want to cover all bases.  That's why they love the concept of "Lite" beer, especially when Miller introduced it as a novelty......their slogan should have been...."costs less to make/ charge more anyway......"    What did P.T. Barnum say about suckers being born every day??????

Let's Get Social

Follow us on FaceBookReddit us!

Members

© 2013   Created by Bryon Turner.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service